LFV GroupHome Logotype
Profile image
Change language to English (US) Change language to Svenska

Macroeconomic gains from a new non-stop route

The information below is a summary of a macroeconomic estimate of what an intercontinental non-stop air route contributes. Please note that the estimate only shows the effects on Swedish citizens.

Direct effects

- A non-stop route between Stockholm and Atlanta is estimated to contribute macroeconomic revenue of about SEK 7 million through time savings for passengers.
- A non-stop route means reduced environmental impact, since stopovers disappear. At the same time it means a certain increase in environmental impact. This is because a non-stop route, which is more attractive and convenient for passengers, generates greater demand and results in more departures. The net amount is a macroeconomic cost of about SEK 3 million per year.
– The direct effects thus add up to a macroeconomic contribution of SEK 4 million per year.

Indirect effects

- The most significant indirect effect is probably a change in the number of customers in the hospitality industry. Estimates show that expenditures in Sweden by inbound passengers will be larger than the “expenditure leakage” caused by outbound Swedish passengers.  
- The increase in expenditures by inbound passengers included in Swedish output totals an estimated SEK 10 million per year.

Tell a friend about this page

Shops at Stockholm-Arlanda

Check out the shops at Stockholm-Arlanda

Chanel, Hugo Boss, Pilgrim and Orrefors. At Stockholm-Arlanda you can buy clothing, cosmetics, perfume and gifts from well-known brands − both before and after your flight. Look at the range of choices, and check out which perfumes are the most popular right now.

Shops, special offers and price list – read more

The environment

Improving the environment

Extensive environmental work is continuously under way at the airport. Green approaches, special privileges for ecotaxis, biogas-powered buses, space heating with biofuel and water treatment are some of the areas of this work. In 2006, 97 per cent of waste went towards recycling or energy production.
Read more about the environmental work